<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metacognitive Letters - Evaluating Yourself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://university-scholar.com/2008/04/metacognitive-letters-evaluating-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://university-scholar.com/2008/04/metacognitive-letters-evaluating-yourself/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://university-scholar.com/2008/04/metacognitive-letters-evaluating-yourself/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://university-scholar.com/?p=76#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Wow. Considering that "metacognitive" papers are actually cognitive, you can write metacognitive papers on them too, ad infinitum. Maybe you should just call it "evaluation" or "self-evaluation" instead of "metacognition," and say "thinkers" or "students" instead of "cognitive processors." Then I wouldn't feel like a machine ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Considering that &#8220;metacognitive&#8221; papers are actually cognitive, you can write metacognitive papers on them too, ad infinitum. Maybe you should just call it &#8220;evaluation&#8221; or &#8220;self-evaluation&#8221; instead of &#8220;metacognition,&#8221; and say &#8220;thinkers&#8221; or &#8220;students&#8221; instead of &#8220;cognitive processors.&#8221; Then I wouldn&#8217;t feel like a machine <img src='http://university-scholar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
